<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="65001"%> China Under the Empress Dowager
    TRADE & GENERAL ART & DESIGN ACADEMIC CHILDREN'S TITLE SCHOOL SEARCH CONTACT US
  CHINA INDONESIA MALAYSIA PHILIPPINES THAILAND VIETNAM OTHERS
HOME
NEW & EVENTS
ASIA INTEREST
ECONOMICS
EDUCATION
HISTORY
LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC
LAW
LIBRARY SCIENCE
LITERACY
LITERARY STUDIES
LOCAL INTEREST
MANAGEMENT
MEDICINE
PHILOSOPHY
POLITICS
RELIGIONS
SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
SOCIAL SCIENCE


ISBN 9789881866745
Publisher: Earnshaw Books
Paperback: 552 pages
Pub Date: Feb 2010

US$19.99

China Under the Empress Dowager
J.O.P. Bland and Edmund Trelawny Backhouse

One of the most popular and controversial Chinese history books ever written, China under the Empress Dowager is also one of the best. Authors Bland and Backhouse take you inside the Forbidden City during the reign of Empress Dowager Cixi (1861-1908), a world of power-thirsty eunuchs, concubines and Mandarins, intrigue, bitter antagonism and ruthless reprisals. The book was unique for its time in its reliance on Chinese source materials, some of which may have been fabricated. As entertaining as it is enlightening, the book that presaged the fall of the Qing dynasty is as readable today as it ever was.

Who are J.O.P. Bland and Edmund Trelawny Backhouse?
J.O.P. Bland (1863-1945) arrived in Shanghai in 1883, and worked for the British-run Chinese Imperial Maritime Customs before going on to serve as China correspondent for the London Times from 1897 until he left China in 1910. He was once described by New York Times as the best informed Westerner on China in the world.

Sir Edmund Trelawny Backhouse (1873-1944) arrived in Peking in 1898 and quickly became the city's most respected translator, working for both the British Foreign Service and the London Times correspondent George Morrison. Considered a brilliant linguist and Chinese scholar in his day, and the subject of Hugh Trevor-Roper's book Hermit of Peking, Backhouse's reputation was posthumously tarnished when it was discovered that much of what he did was forged or fraudulent. Precisely how much and which parts of his writings were real and which faked is one of the great puzzles of the era.