<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="65001"%> Afghanistan: How the West Lost Its Way
    TRADE & GENERAL ART & DESIGN ACADEMIC CHILDREN'S TITLE SCHOOL SEARCH CONTACT US
  JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
HOME
NEWS & EVENTS
ASIA INTEREST
ECONOMICS
EDUCATION
HISTORY
LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC
LAW
LIBRARY SCIENCE
LITERACY
LITERARY STUDIES
LOCAL INTEREST
MANAGEMENT
MEDICINE
PHILOSOPHY
POLITICS
RELIGIONS
SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
SOCIAL SCIENCE



ISBN 9780300154573
Yale University Press
Hardback: 304 pages
Pub Date: Jun 2011
US$30.00

Afghanistan: How the West Lost Its Way
Tim Bird and Alex Marshall


In October 2001, NATO forces invaded Afghanistan. Their initial aim, to topple the Taliban regime and replace it with a more democratic government aligned to Western interests, was swiftly achieved. However, stabilizing the country in the ensuing years has proven much more difficult. Despite billions of dollars in aid and military expenditure, Afghanistan remains a nation riddled with warlords, the world's major heroin producer, and the site of a seemingly endless conflict between Islamist militants and NATO forces.

In this timely and important book, Tim Bird and Alex Marshall offer a panoramic view of international involvement in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2011. Tackling the subject matter as a whole, Bird and Marshall weave together analysis of military strategy, regional context, aid policy, the Afghan government, and the many disagreements between and within the Western powers involved in the intervention. Given the complicating factors of the heroin trade, unwelcoming terrain, and precarious relations with Pakistan, the authors acknowledge the ways in which Afghanistan has presented unique challenges for its foreign invaders. Ultimately, however, they argue that the international community has failed in its self-imposed effort to solve Afghanistan's problems and that there are broader lessons to be learned from their struggle, particularly in terms of counterinsurgency and the ever-complicated work of "nation-building." The overarching feature of the intervention, they argue, has been an absence of strategic clarity and coherence.